Retrospective comparison of clinical outcomes  between endovenous laser and saphenous vein-sparing surgery for treatment of varicose veins

C.-Y.a , Chen, T.-C.b , Hsieh, Y.-K.a , Huang, J.-H.c Retrospective comparison of clinical outcomes between endovenous laser and saphenous vein-sparing surgery for treatment of varicose veins(2011) World Journal of Surgery, 35 (7), pp. 1679-1686.

a Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
b Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Min-Sheng General Hospital, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
c Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Nanya S. Rd, Banqiao City, Taipei County 22060, Taiwan

Abstract
Background: The purpose of the present study was to compare management of varicose veins by endovenous laser ablation (EVL) and a vein-sparing procedure (CHIVA: Conservatrice et Hémodynamique de l'Insuffisance Veineuse en Ambulatoire) for management of varicose veins. Methods: Data from 82 consecutive patients with great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux and primary varicose veins presenting to the vascular clinic at the Far Eastern Memorial Hospital between June and December 2005 were reviewed. Of these, 74 who met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. CHIVA was performed by a double division of the refluxing saphenous vein (i.e., proximal and distal ligation), and EVL was performed using 10-14 W beginning approximately 4 cm below the saphenofemoral junction to the level of the knee. Phlebectomy for significant branch varicose veins on the leg was routinely performed in all patients. Outcome measures included postoperative thrombophlebitis, bruising, pain, assessment of ultrasonographic and clinical symptoms (measured by the Venous Clinical Severity Score [VCSS]) and comparison of quality of life survey scores obtained preoperatively and postoperatively (measured by the Aberdeen Varicose Veins Score [AVVQ] and RAND-36). Patients were examined one week post-procedurally and again at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: Endovenous laser ablation and CHIVA were performed on 54 and 20 patients, respectively. The EVL patients had significantly higher pain scores and bruising than the CHIVA group (p < 0.001). The VCSS of varicose, edema, pigmentation, and inflammation were significantly reduced after both EVL and CHIVA; however, patients treated by EVL had significantly more pain postoperatively than those treated by CHIVA (p = 0.003). Twenty-two of 54 (40.7%) and 3 of 17 (17.6%) patients in the EVL and CHIVA groups, respectively, required sclerotherapy for residual varicosities (p = 0.026). Both groups benefited significantly from surgery in disease-specific perceptions. Conclusions: The CHIVA patients had less pain postoperatively and a significantly higher sclerotherapy-free period compared to patients in the EVL group. Further follow-up studies to compare long-term results of various approaches to surgically managing varicose veins are needed. © 2011 Société Internationale de Chirurgie.

References

Michaels, J.A., Brazier, J.E., Campbell, W.B., MacIntyre, J.B., Palfreyman, S.J., Ratcliffe, J.
Randomized clinical trial comparing surgery with conservative treatment for uncomplicated varicose veins
(2006) British Journal of Surgery, 93 (2), pp. 175-181. 
DOI 10.1002/bjs.5264

Almeida, J.I., Raines, J.K.
Radiofrequency ablation and laser ablation in the treatment of varicose veins
(2006) Annals of Vascular Surgery, 20 (4), pp. 547-552. 
DOI 10.1007/s10016-006-9098-8

Puggioni, A., Kalra, M., Carmo, M., Mozes, G., Gloviczki, P.
Endovenous laser therapy and radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein: Analysis of early efficacy and complications
(2005) Journal of Vascular Surgery, 42 (3), pp. 488-493. 
DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.014, PII S0741521405007664

Lurie, F., Creton, D., Eklof, B., Kabnick, L.S., Kistner, R.L., Pichot, O., Sessa, C., Schuller-Petrovic, S.
Prospective randomised study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure) versus ligation and vein stripping (EVOLVeS): Two-year follow-up
(2005) European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 29 (1), pp. 67-73. 
DOI 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.09.019, PII S1078588404004472

Lorenz, D., Gabel, W., Redtenbacher, M., Weissenhofer, W., Minzlaff, M., Stengel, D.
Randomized clinical trial comparing bipolar coagulating and standard great saphenous stripping for symptomatic varicose veins
(2007) British Journal of Surgery, 94 (4), pp. 434-440. 
DOI 10.1002/bjs.5727

Rivlin, S.
The surgical cure of primary varicose veins
(1975) Br J Surg, 62, pp. 913-917. 
1191955 10.1002/bjs.1800621114 1:STN:280:DyaE28%2Fmtlamuw%3D%3D

De Medeiros, C.A.F., Luccas, G.C.
Comparison of endovenous treatment with an 810 nm laser versus conventional stripping of the great saphenous vein in patients with primary varicose veins
(2005) Dermatologic Surgery, 31 (12), pp. 1685-1694.

Mekako, A.I., Hatfield, J., Bryce, J., Lee, D., McCollum, P.T., Chetter, I.
A nonrandomised controlled trial of endovenous laser therapy and surgery in the treatment of varicose veins
(2006) Annals of Vascular Surgery, 20 (4), pp. 451-457. 
DOI 10.1007/s10016-006-9095-y

Proebstle, T.M., Gul, D., Lehr, H.A., Kargl, A., Knop, J.
Infrequent early recanalization of greater saphenous vein after endovenous laser treatment
(2003) Journal of Vascular Surgery, 38 (3), pp. 511-516. 
DOI 10.1016/S0741-5214(03)00420-8

Dunst, K.M., Huemer, G.M., Wayand, W.
Diffuse phlegmonous phlebitis after endovenous laser treatment of the greater saphenous vein
(2006) J Vasc Surg, 43, pp. 1056-1058. 
16678705 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.01.030

Raivio, P., Perhoniemi, V., Lehtola, A.
Long-term results of vein sparing varicose vein surgery
(2002) World Journal of Surgery, 26 (12), pp. 1507-1511. 
DOI 10.1007/s00268-002-6375-8

Franceschi, C.
(1998) Theorie et Pratique de la Cure Conservatrice de l'Insuffisance Veineuse en Ambulatoire, 
Precy-Sous-Thil, Editions de L'Armancon

Maeso, J., Juan, J., Escribano, J.M., Allegue, N., Matteo, A., Gonzalez, E., Matas, M.
Comparison of clinical outcome of stripping and CHIVA for treatment of varicose veins in the lower extremities
(2001) Annals of Vascular Surgery, 15 (6), pp. 661-665.

Pres, J.O., Juan, J., Tellez, R.
Varicose vein surgery
(2010) Ann Surg, 251, pp. 624-631. 
10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d0d0a3

Fichelle, J.M., Carbone, P., Franceschi, C.
Results of ambulatory and hemodynamic treatment of venous insufficiency (CHIVA cure)
(1992) J Mal Vasc, 17, pp. 224-228. 
1431610 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FlslWgsA%3D%3D (French)

Franco, G.
The ambulatory and hemodynamic treatment of varicose veins (CHIVA cure). Revolution or regression
(1992) Journal des Maladies Vasculaires, 17 (4), pp. 301-307.

Kistner, R.L., Eklof, B., Masuda, E.M.
Diagnosis of chronic venous disease of the lower extremities: The "cEAP" classification
(1996) Mayo Clin Proc, 71, pp. 338-345. 
8637255 10.4065/71.4.338 1:STN:280:DyaK287pslahtw%3D%3D

Meissner, M.H., Natiello, C., Nicholls, S.C.
Performance characteristics of the venous clinical severity score
(2002) Journal of Vascular Surgery, 36 (5), pp. 889-895. 
DOI 10.1067/mva.2002.128637

Cappelli, M., Lova, R.M., Ermini, S., Turchi, A., Bono, G., Bahnini, A., Franceschi, C.
Ambulatory conservative hemodynamic management of varicose veins: Critical analysis of results at 3 years
(2000) Annals of Vascular Surgery, 14 (4), pp. 376-384. 
DOI 10.1007/s100169910064

Chan, C.Y., Li, S.J., Chiu, K.M.
Endovenous laser treatment for varicosities in lower extremities
(2006) Formosan J Surg, 39, pp. 113-118.

Smith, J.J., Garratt, A.M., Guest, M., Greenhalgh, R.M., Davies, A.H.
Evaluating and improving health-related quality of life in patients with varicose veins
(1999) Journal of Vascular Surgery, 30 (4), pp. 710-709. 
DOI 10.1016/S0741-5214(99)70110-2

Hays, R.D., Sherbourne, C.D., Mazel, R.M.
The RAND 36-item health survey 1.0
(1993) Health Econ, 2, pp. 217-227. 
8275167 10.1002/hec.4730020305 1:STN:280:DyaK2c7gtFSltQ%3D%3D

Bowling, A.
(1995) Measuring Disease: A Review of Disease-specific Quality of Life Measurement Scales, Buckingham, 
Open University Press UK

Van Den Bos, R.R., Kockaert, M.A., Neumann, H.A.M., Nijsten, T.
Technical Review of Endovenous Laser Therapy for Varicose Veins
(2008) European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 35 (1), pp. 88-95. 
DOI 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.08.005, PII S1078588407005357

Navarro, L., Min, R.J., Bone, C.
Endovenous laser: A new minimally invasive method of treatment for varicose veins - Preliminary observations using an 810 nm diode laser
(2001) Dermatologic Surgery, 27 (2), pp. 117-122. 
DOI 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2001.00134.x

Agus, G.B., Mancini, S., Magi, G., Santuari, D., Mondani, P., Brambilla, S., Mancini, S., Pignatelli, F.
The first 1000 cases of Italian Endovenous-laser Working Group (IEWG). Rationale, and long-term outcomes for the 1999-2003 period
(2006) International Angiology, 25 (2), pp. 209-215.

Proebstle, T.M., Moehler, T., Herdemann, S.
Reduced recanalization rates of the great saphenous vein after endovenous laser treatment with increased energy dosing: Definition of a threshold for the endovenous fluence equivalent
(2006) Journal of Vascular Surgery, 44 (4), pp. 834-839. 
DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.05.052, PII S0741521406010159

Sharif, M.A., Lau, L.L., Lee, B., Hannon, R.J., Soong, C.V.
Role of Endovenous Laser Treatment in the Management of Chronic Venous Insufficiency
(2007) Annals of Vascular Surgery, 21 (5), pp. 551-555. 
DOI 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.07.007, PII S0890509607002579

Viarengo, L.M., Potério-Filho, J., Potério, G.M.
Endovenous laser treatment for varicose veins in patients with active ulcers: Measurement of intravenous and perivenous temperatures during the procedure
(2007) Dermatol Surg, 33, pp. 1234-1242. 
17903157 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33259.x 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFyit73I

Proebstle, T.M., Lehr, H.A., Kargl, A.
Endovenous treatment of the greater saphenous vein with a 940-nm diode laser: Thrombotic occlusion after endoluminal thermal damage by laser-generated steam bubbles
(2002) J Vasc Surg, 35, pp. 729-736. 
11932671 10.1067/mva.2002.121132 1:STN:280:DC%2BD383ksVSmug%3D%3D

Mozes, G., Kalra, M., Carmo, M., Swenson, L., Gloviczki, P.
Extension of saphenous thrombus into the femoral vein: A potential complication of new endovenous ablation techniques
(2005) Journal of Vascular Surgery, 41 (1), pp. 130-135. 
DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.10.045, PII S074152140401482X

Blomgren, L., Johansson, G., Bergqvist, D.
Quality of life after surgery for varicose veins and the impact of preoperative duplex: Results based on a randomized trial
(2006) Annals of Vascular Surgery, 20 (1), pp. 30-34. 
DOI 10.1007/s10016-005-9285-z

Zamboni, P., Marcellino, M.G., Cappelli, M., Feo, C.V., Bresadola, V., Vasquez, G., Liboni, A.
Saphenous vein sparing surgery: Principles, techniques and results
(1998) Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 39 (2), pp. 151-162.

Proebstle, T.M., Krummenauer, F., Gul, D., Knop, J.
Nonocclusion and Early Reopening of the Great Saphenous Vein after Endovenous Laser Treatment Is Fluence Dependent
(2004) Dermatologic Surgery, 30 (2), pp. 174-178. 
DOI 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30051.x

Labropoulos, N., Bhatti, A., Leon, L., Borge, M., Rodriguez, H., Kalman, P.
Neovascularization after great saphenous vein ablation
(2006) European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 31 (2), pp. 219-222. 
DOI 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.06.030, PII S1078588405004387

Correspondence Address 
Huang J.-H.; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Nanya S. Rd, Banqiao City, Taipei County 22060, Taiwan; email: 007351@ntuh.gov.tw